[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f1c21e9-ba0f-4262-8f56-962e0a7d6877@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:31:17 -0700
From: Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@....org>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Jens Remus
<jremus@...ux.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 02/14] unwind_user: Add frame pointer support
On 6/18/25 8:09 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:52:01 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
>>> +the_end:
>>> + state->done = true;
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>
>> I'm thinking 'the_end' might be better named 'done' ?
>
> I thought it was cute ;-) (BTW, I didn't name it).
>
> But sure, I can update it to be something more common.
>
>>
>> Also, CFA here is Call-Frame-Address and RA Return-Address ?
>
> I believe so. Do you want me to add a comment?
>
If a comment is added, Canonical Frame Address will be more appropriate.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists