[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61c653aa5f298ded89f35eef76374b3138d17b02.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 13:28:17 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann
<tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter
<simona@...ll.ch>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Joonas
Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi
<rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, Kuniyuki
Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>, Nathan
Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 5/9] ref_tracker: allow pr_ostream() to print
directly to a seq_file
On Mon, 2025-06-23 at 14:01 +0000, Krzysztof Karas wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> [...]
> > +static __maybe_unused int
> > +ref_tracker_dir_seq_print(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir, struct seq_file *seq)
> > +{
> > + struct ostream os = { .func = pr_ostream_seq,
> > + .prefix = "",
> This is also a "ref_tracker_*" function, so maybe use the same
> prefix as in other functions? I mean .prefix = "ref_tracker:".
> Unless, you have a reason for leaving it empty ;)
>
I have a reason to leave it empty.
That is the prefix for each line that gets printed by the pr_ostream()
call. This one is for the lines that go to the debugfs files. I think
it will be redundant to prepend every line in these files with
"ref_tracker: ".
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists