[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b5a8537-af16-46a1-b2ac-0374ed0f493a@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 20:17:44 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Joy Zou <joy.zou@....com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
richardcochran@...il.com, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.or, frank.li@....com, ye.li@....com,
ping.bai@....com, aisheng.dong@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] arm64: dts: freescale: add i.MX91 11x11 EVK basic
support
> +&eqos {
> + phy-handle = <ðphy1>;
> + phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_eqos>;
> + pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_eqos_sleep>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + mdio {
> + compatible = "snps,dwmac-mdio";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + clock-frequency = <5000000>;
> +
> + ethphy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + realtek,clkout-disable;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&fec {
> + phy-handle = <ðphy2>;
> + phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_fec>;
> + pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_fec_sleep>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
> + fsl,magic-packet;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + mdio {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + clock-frequency = <5000000>;
> +
> + ethphy2: ethernet-phy@2 {
> + reg = <2>;
> + eee-broken-1000t;
> + realtek,clkout-disable;
> + };
What is actually broken with EEE? Is it actually the FEC?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists