[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFm28aLvL0Lu7LuH@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 10:20:01 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/14] sched/deadline: Return EBUSY if dl_bw_cpus is
zero
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 04:32:20PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> - if (__dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, old_bw, new_bw))
> + // Hotplugged CPUs coming online do an enqueue but are not a part of any
> + // root domain containing cpu_active() CPUs. So in this case, don't mess
> + // with accounting and we can retry later.
> + if (!cpus || __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, old_bw, new_bw))
> return -EBUSY;
Maybe match the comment style in the file?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists