[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFj5K2iBOt3cGPDv@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:50:19 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] iio: adc: ad_sigma_delta: sort includes
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 03:37:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:20:07 -0500
> David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
...
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> Andy normally points this out (and may well do here) but in
> general if we are tidying up headers we should try to drop includes
> of kernel.h if favour of more specific headers.
>
> Doesn't need to be in same patch as this one though!
>
> This is trivial and correct as it stands and would want to be
> done as a precursor to any actual changes anyway.
Yeah, kernel.h in the (leaf) drivers is a red flag to me.
But replacing it is out of scope of this patch and may be
done separately. My only point that please do it rather
sooner.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists