[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17f789c6-cf64-4940-ac7b-0107b7b96031@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 15:37:08 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
davem@...emloft.net, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [net-next v13 04/11] net: mtip: The L2 switch driver for imx287
On 6/22/25 11:37 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> +static void mtip_adjust_link(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct mtip_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct switch_enet_private *fep = priv->fep;
> + struct phy_device *phy_dev;
> + int status_change = 0, idx;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&fep->hw_lock, flags);
The above kind of lock look incorrect. In later patch you use
spin_lock_bh(), and the context here is never irq.
Should be spin_lock_bh()
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists