[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250624133923.1140421-6-ptesarik@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 15:39:20 +0200
From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org (open list:DOCUMENTATION),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list),
linux-mm@...ck.org (open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT),
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] docs: dma-api: remove duplicate description of the DMA pool API
The DMA pool API is documented in Memory Management APIs. Do not duplicate
it in DMA API documentation.
Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>
---
Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst | 62 +-----------------------------
Documentation/core-api/mm-api.rst | 2 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst b/Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst
index 3e89e3b0ecfd..f7fddaf7510c 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst
@@ -83,66 +83,8 @@ much like a struct kmem_cache, except that they use the DMA-coherent allocator,
not __get_free_pages(). Also, they understand common hardware constraints
for alignment, like queue heads needing to be aligned on N-byte boundaries.
-
-::
-
- struct dma_pool *
- dma_pool_create(const char *name, struct device *dev,
- size_t size, size_t align, size_t alloc);
-
-dma_pool_create() initializes a pool of DMA-coherent buffers
-for use with a given device. It must be called in a context which
-can sleep.
-
-The "name" is for diagnostics (like a struct kmem_cache name); dev and size
-are like what you'd pass to dma_alloc_coherent(). The device's hardware
-alignment requirement for this type of data is "align" (which is expressed
-in bytes, and must be a power of two). If your device has no boundary
-crossing restrictions, pass 0 for alloc; passing 4096 says memory allocated
-from this pool must not cross 4KByte boundaries.
-
-::
-
- void *
- dma_pool_zalloc(struct dma_pool *pool, gfp_t mem_flags,
- dma_addr_t *handle)
-
-Wraps dma_pool_alloc() and also zeroes the returned memory if the
-allocation attempt succeeded.
-
-
-::
-
- void *
- dma_pool_alloc(struct dma_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp_flags,
- dma_addr_t *dma_handle);
-
-This allocates memory from the pool; the returned memory will meet the
-size and alignment requirements specified at creation time. Pass
-GFP_ATOMIC to prevent blocking, or if it's permitted (not
-in_interrupt, not holding SMP locks), pass GFP_KERNEL to allow
-blocking. Like dma_alloc_coherent(), this returns two values: an
-address usable by the CPU, and the DMA address usable by the pool's
-device.
-
-::
-
- void
- dma_pool_free(struct dma_pool *pool, void *vaddr,
- dma_addr_t addr);
-
-This puts memory back into the pool. The pool is what was passed to
-dma_pool_alloc(); the CPU (vaddr) and DMA addresses are what
-were returned when that routine allocated the memory being freed.
-
-::
-
- void
- dma_pool_destroy(struct dma_pool *pool);
-
-dma_pool_destroy() frees the resources of the pool. It must be
-called in a context which can sleep. Make sure you've freed all allocated
-memory back to the pool before you destroy it.
+See :ref:`Documentation/core-api/mm-api.rst <dma_pools>` for a detailed
+description of the DMA pools API.
Part Ic - DMA addressing limitations
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/mm-api.rst b/Documentation/core-api/mm-api.rst
index a61766328ac0..de0bab6e3fdd 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/mm-api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/mm-api.rst
@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ Memory pools
.. kernel-doc:: mm/mempool.c
:export:
+.. _dma_pools:
+
DMA pools
=========
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists