[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<CY5PR20MB4867E63E4B5107728904826EC678A@CY5PR20MB4867.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 16:57:10 +0000
From: Adam Xue <zxue@...tech.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, Thomas Perrot
<thomas.perrot@...tlin.com>, Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@...ksander.es>
CC: "manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org" <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
"slark_xiao@....com" <slark_xiao@....com>, "johan+linaro@...nel.org"
<johan+linaro@...nel.org>, "quic_vpernami@...cinc.com"
<quic_vpernami@...cinc.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"fabio.porcedda@...il.com" <fabio.porcedda@...il.com>,
"quic_msarkar@...cinc.com" <quic_msarkar@...cinc.com>, "mhi@...ts.linux.dev"
<mhi@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Iulian Mocanu <imocanu@...tech.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] bus: mhi: host: pci_generic: Add support for EM929x
and set MRU to 32768 for better performance.
Hi Mani and Aleksander,
I may collect the logs if required. Or we can ship an EM91 module for you to validate?
Thanks,
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Sent: June 17, 2025 2:27 AM
To: Adam Xue <zxue@...tech.com>; Thomas Perrot <thomas.perrot@...tlin.com>; Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@...ksander.es>
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org; slark_xiao@....com; johan+linaro@...nel.org; quic_vpernami@...cinc.com; tglx@...utronix.de; fabio.porcedda@...il.com; quic_msarkar@...cinc.com; mhi@...ts.linux.dev; linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Iulian Mocanu <imocanu@...tech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] bus: mhi: host: pci_generic: Add support for EM929x and set MRU to 32768 for better performance.
Caution: This email originated outside of Semtech.
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:59:43AM -0700, Adam Xue wrote:
+ Thomas and Aleksander (for EM919X related question)
> Add MHI controller config for EM929x. It uses the same configuration
> as EM919x. Also set the MRU to 32768 to improve downlink throughput.
>
This also affects the EM919X modem. So I want either Thomas or Aleksander to confirm that it doesn't cause any regression.
Rest looks good to me.
- Mani
> 02:00.0 Unassigned class [ff00]: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc Device 0308
> Subsystem: Device 18d7:0301
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Xue <zxue@...tech.com>
> ---
> drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c
> b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c
> index 03aa88795209..9bf8e7991745 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c
> @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static const struct mhi_pci_dev_info mhi_sierra_em919x_info = {
> .config = &modem_sierra_em919x_config,
> .bar_num = MHI_PCI_DEFAULT_BAR_NUM,
> .dma_data_width = 32,
> + .mru_default = 32768,
> .sideband_wake = false,
> };
>
> @@ -813,6 +814,9 @@ static const struct pci_device_id mhi_pci_id_table[] = {
> /* EM919x (sdx55), use the same vid:pid as qcom-sdx55m */
> { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM, 0x0306, 0x18d7, 0x0200),
> .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t) &mhi_sierra_em919x_info
> },
> + /* EM929x (sdx65), use the same configuration as EM919x */
> + { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM, 0x0308, 0x18d7, 0x0301),
> + .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t) &mhi_sierra_em919x_info
> + },
> /* Telit FN980 hardware revision v1 */
> { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM, 0x0306, 0x1C5D, 0x2000),
> .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)
> &mhi_telit_fn980_hw_v1_info },
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
> To view our privacy policy, including the types of personal information we collect, process and share, and the rights and options you have in this respect, see www.semtech.com/legal.
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
To view our privacy policy, including the types of personal information we collect, process and share, and the rights and options you have in this respect, see www.semtech.com/legal.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists