[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250624163013.06c6c726@batman.local.home>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 16:30:13 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim
<namhyung@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrii
Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@....org>, Beau
Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>, Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 02/14] unwind_user: Add frame pointer support
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:31:17 -0700
Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com> wrote:
> >> Also, CFA here is Call-Frame-Address and RA Return-Address ?
> >
> > I believe so. Do you want me to add a comment?
> >
>
> If a comment is added, Canonical Frame Address will be more appropriate.
Thanks Indu,
Updated.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists