[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <858qlhhj4c.fsf@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 04:13:39 +0000
From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bp@...en8.de>, <x86@...nel.org>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<thomas.lendacky@....com>, <aik@....com>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sev: Use TSC_FACTOR for Secure TSC frequency
calculation
Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com> writes:
> When using Secure TSC, the GUEST_TSC_FREQ MSR reports a frequency based on
> the nominal P0 frequency, which deviates slightly (typically ~0.2%) from
> the actual mean TSC frequency due to clocking parameters. Over extended VM
> uptime, this discrepancy accumulates, causing clock skew between the
> hypervisor and SEV-SNP VM, leading to early timer interrupts as perceived
> by the guest.
>
> The guest kernel relies on the reported nominal frequency for TSC-based
> timekeeping, while the actual frequency set during SNP_LAUNCH_START may
> differ. This mismatch results in inaccurate time calculations, causing the
> guest to perceive hrtimers as firing earlier than expected.
>
> Utilize the TSC_FACTOR from the SEV firmware's secrets page (see "Secrets
> Page Format" in the SNP Firmware ABI Specification) to calculate the mean
> TSC frequency, ensuring accurate timekeeping and mitigating clock skew in
> SEV-SNP VMs.
>
> Use early_ioremap_encrypted() to map the secrets page as
> ioremap_encrypted() uses kmalloc() which is not available during early TSC
> initialization and causes a panic.
>
> Fixes: 73bbf3b0fbba ("x86/tsc: Init the TSC for Secure TSC guests")
> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>
A gentle reminder for review.
Thanks
Nikunj
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h | 5 ++++-
> arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> index 58e028d42e41..655d7e37bbcc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> @@ -282,8 +282,11 @@ struct snp_secrets_page {
> u8 svsm_guest_vmpl;
> u8 rsvd3[3];
>
> + /* The percentage decrease from nominal to mean TSC frequency. */
> + u32 tsc_factor;
> +
> /* Remainder of page */
> - u8 rsvd4[3744];
> + u8 rsvd4[3740];
> } __packed;
>
> struct snp_msg_desc {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> index b6db4e0b936b..ffd44712cec0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> @@ -2167,15 +2167,39 @@ static unsigned long securetsc_get_tsc_khz(void)
>
> void __init snp_secure_tsc_init(void)
> {
> + struct snp_secrets_page *secrets;
> unsigned long long tsc_freq_mhz;
> + void *mem;
>
> if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC))
> return;
>
> + mem = early_memremap_encrypted(sev_secrets_pa, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (!mem) {
> + pr_err("Unable to get TSC_FACTOR: failed to map the SNP secrets page.\n");
> + sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_LINUX, GHCB_TERM_SECURE_TSC);
> + }
> +
> + secrets = (__force struct snp_secrets_page *)mem;
> +
> setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ);
> rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_GUEST_TSC_FREQ, tsc_freq_mhz);
> snp_tsc_freq_khz = (unsigned long)(tsc_freq_mhz * 1000);
>
> + /*
> + * Obtain the mean TSC frequency by decreasing the nominal TSC frequency with
> + * TSC_FACTOR as documented in the SNP Firmware ABI specification:
> + *
> + * GUEST_TSC_FREQ * (1 - (TSC_FACTOR * 0.00001))
> + *
> + * which is equivalent to:
> + *
> + * GUEST_TSC_FREQ -= (GUEST_TSC_FREQ * TSC_FACTOR) / 100000;
> + */
> + snp_tsc_freq_khz -= (snp_tsc_freq_khz * secrets->tsc_factor) / 100000;
> +
> x86_platform.calibrate_cpu = securetsc_get_tsc_khz;
> x86_platform.calibrate_tsc = securetsc_get_tsc_khz;
> +
> + early_memunmap(mem, PAGE_SIZE);
> }
>
> base-commit: 337964c8abfbef645cbbe25245e25c11d9d1fc4c
> --
> 2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists