[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4db45281-9943-4ed7-80c6-04b39c3e9a5e@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:28:32 +0200
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Li Yang <yang.li@...ogic.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_event: Add support for handling LE BIG
Sync Lost event
Dear Li,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 24.06.25 um 07:20 schrieb Yang Li via B4 Relay:
> From: Yang Li <yang.li@...ogic.com>
>
> When the BIS source stops, the controller sends an LE BIG Sync Lost
> event (subevent 0x1E). Currently, this event is not handled, causing
> the BIS stream to remain active in BlueZ and preventing recovery.
How can this situation be emulated to test your patch?
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.li@...ogic.com>
> ---
> include/net/bluetooth/hci.h | 6 ++++++
> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> index 82cbd54443ac..48389a64accb 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> @@ -2849,6 +2849,12 @@ struct hci_evt_le_big_sync_estabilished {
> __le16 bis[];
> } __packed;
>
> +#define HCI_EVT_LE_BIG_SYNC_LOST 0x1e
> +struct hci_evt_le_big_sync_lost {
> + __u8 handle;
> + __u8 reason;
> +} __packed;
> +
> #define HCI_EVT_LE_BIG_INFO_ADV_REPORT 0x22
> struct hci_evt_le_big_info_adv_report {
> __le16 sync_handle;
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> index 66052d6aaa1d..730deaf1851f 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> @@ -7026,6 +7026,24 @@ static void hci_le_big_sync_established_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
> hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> }
>
> +static void hci_le_big_sync_lost_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct hci_evt_le_big_sync_lost *ev = data;
> + struct hci_conn *conn;
> +
> + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "BIG Sync Lost: big_handle 0x%2.2x", ev->handle);
> +
> + hci_dev_lock(hdev);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(conn, &hdev->conn_hash.list, list) {
> + if (test_bit(HCI_CONN_BIG_SYNC, &conn->flags))
> + hci_disconn_cfm(conn, HCI_ERROR_REMOTE_USER_TERM);
> + }
> +
> + hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> +}
> +
> static void hci_le_big_info_adv_report_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> @@ -7149,6 +7167,11 @@ static const struct hci_le_ev {
> hci_le_big_sync_established_evt,
> sizeof(struct hci_evt_le_big_sync_estabilished),
> HCI_MAX_EVENT_SIZE),
> + /* [0x1e = HCI_EVT_LE_BIG_SYNC_LOST] */
> + HCI_LE_EV_VL(HCI_EVT_LE_BIG_SYNC_LOST,
> + hci_le_big_sync_lost_evt,
> + sizeof(struct hci_evt_le_big_sync_lost),
> + HCI_MAX_EVENT_SIZE),
> /* [0x22 = HCI_EVT_LE_BIG_INFO_ADV_REPORT] */
> HCI_LE_EV_VL(HCI_EVT_LE_BIG_INFO_ADV_REPORT,
> hci_le_big_info_adv_report_evt,
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists