[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d83088ebfeee7f7d3190872234f7b53ee758c65.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:03:47 +0200
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>, Yoshinori
Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, Willy
Tarreau <w@....eu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] tools/nolibc: add support for SuperH
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 2025-06-23 at 23:15 +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Add support for SuperH/"sh" to nolibc.
> Only sh4 is tested for now.
>
> This is only tested on QEMU so far.
> Additional testing would be very welcome.
> Test instructions:
> $ cd tools/testings/selftests/nolibc/
> $ make -f Makefile.nolibc ARCH=sh CROSS_COMPILE=sh4-linux- nolibc-test
> $ file nolibc-test
> nolibc-test: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Renesas SH, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, not stripped
> $ ./nolibc-test
> Running test 'startup'
> 0 argc = 1 [OK]
> ...
> Total number of errors: 0
> Exiting with status 0
Apologies, I haven't been able to test this yet as my board currently
doesn't want to boot kernels newer than v6.5.0 and I have not been able
to bisect the problem yet.
Can I test this on v6.5.0 as well?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists