[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHUa44GXCVaShPhw_Yw0+CWovX+pi7=UOXXGr5dKKSXz4JppeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 09:38:43 +0200
From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To: Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Olivier Masse <olivier.masse@....com>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>, Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, "T . J . Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, azarrabi@....qualcomm.com,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>, Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>,
Rouven Czerwinski <rouven.czerwinski@...aro.org>, robin.murphy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 7/9] optee: support protected memory allocation
Hi Amir,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 8:54 AM Amirreza Zarrabi
<amirreza.zarrabi@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> On 6/10/2025 11:13 PM, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > Add support in the OP-TEE backend driver for protected memory
> > allocation. The support is limited to only the SMC ABI and for secure
> > video buffers.
> >
> > OP-TEE is probed for the range of protected physical memory and a
> > memory pool allocator is initialized if OP-TEE have support for such
> > memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig | 5 +++
> > drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 10 +++++
> > drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 2 +
> > drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig b/drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig
> > index 7bb7990d0b07..50d2051f7f20 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig
> > @@ -25,3 +25,8 @@ config OPTEE_INSECURE_LOAD_IMAGE
> >
> > Additional documentation on kernel security risks are at
> > Documentation/tee/op-tee.rst.
> > +
> > +config OPTEE_STATIC_PROTMEM_POOL
> > + bool
> > + depends on HAS_IOMEM && TEE_DMABUF_HEAPS
> > + default y
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> > index c75fddc83576..4b14a7ac56f9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> > @@ -56,6 +56,15 @@ int optee_rpmb_intf_rdev(struct notifier_block *intf, unsigned long action,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +int optee_set_dma_mask(struct optee *optee, u_int pa_width)
> > +{
> > + u64 mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(min(64, pa_width));
> > +
>
> nit: Why not dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() instead of bellow?
Good point, I'll update in the next version.
Thanks,
Jens
>
> - Amir
>
> > + optee->teedev->dev.dma_mask = &optee->teedev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> > +
> > + return dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&optee->teedev->dev, mask);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void optee_bus_scan(struct work_struct *work)
> > {
> > WARN_ON(optee_enumerate_devices(PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES_SUPP));
> > @@ -181,6 +190,7 @@ void optee_remove_common(struct optee *optee)
> > tee_device_unregister(optee->supp_teedev);
> > tee_device_unregister(optee->teedev);
> >
> > + tee_device_unregister_all_dma_heaps(optee->teedev);
> > tee_shm_pool_free(optee->pool);
> > optee_supp_uninit(&optee->supp);
> > mutex_destroy(&optee->call_queue.mutex);
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > index dc0f355ef72a..5e3c34802121 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > @@ -272,6 +272,8 @@ struct optee_call_ctx {
> >
> > extern struct blocking_notifier_head optee_rpmb_intf_added;
> >
> > +int optee_set_dma_mask(struct optee *optee, u_int pa_width);
> > +
> > int optee_notif_init(struct optee *optee, u_int max_key);
> > void optee_notif_uninit(struct optee *optee);
> > int optee_notif_wait(struct optee *optee, u_int key, u32 timeout);
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> > index f0c3ac1103bb..cf106d15e64e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> > @@ -1584,6 +1584,68 @@ static inline int optee_load_fw(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +static struct tee_protmem_pool *static_protmem_pool_init(struct optee *optee)
> > +{
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OPTEE_STATIC_PROTMEM_POOL)
> > + union {
> > + struct arm_smccc_res smccc;
> > + struct optee_smc_get_protmem_config_result result;
> > + } res;
> > + struct tee_protmem_pool *pool;
> > + void *p;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + optee->smc.invoke_fn(OPTEE_SMC_GET_PROTMEM_CONFIG, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> > + 0, 0, 0, &res.smccc);
> > + if (res.result.status != OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > +
> > + rc = optee_set_dma_mask(optee, res.result.pa_width);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Map the memory as uncached to make sure the kernel can work with
> > + * __pfn_to_page() and friends since that's needed when passing the
> > + * protected DMA-buf to a device. The memory should otherwise not
> > + * be touched by the kernel since it's likely to cause an external
> > + * abort due to the protection status.
> > + */
> > + p = devm_memremap(&optee->teedev->dev, res.result.start,
> > + res.result.size, MEMREMAP_WC);
> > + if (IS_ERR(p))
> > + return p;
> > +
> > + pool = tee_protmem_static_pool_alloc(res.result.start, res.result.size);
> > + if (IS_ERR(pool))
> > + devm_memunmap(&optee->teedev->dev, p);
> > +
> > + return pool;
> > +#else
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int optee_protmem_pool_init(struct optee *optee)
> > +{
> > + enum tee_dma_heap_id heap_id = TEE_DMA_HEAP_SECURE_VIDEO_PLAY;
> > + struct tee_protmem_pool *pool = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + if (!(optee->smc.sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_PROTMEM))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + pool = static_protmem_pool_init(optee);
> > + if (IS_ERR(pool))
> > + return PTR_ERR(pool);
> > +
> > + rc = tee_device_register_dma_heap(optee->teedev, heap_id, pool);
> > + if (rc)
> > + pool->ops->destroy_pool(pool);
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > optee_invoke_fn *invoke_fn;
> > @@ -1679,7 +1741,7 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > optee = kzalloc(sizeof(*optee), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!optee) {
> > rc = -ENOMEM;
> > - goto err_free_pool;
> > + goto err_free_shm_pool;
> > }
> >
> > optee->ops = &optee_ops;
> > @@ -1752,6 +1814,9 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > pr_info("Asynchronous notifications enabled\n");
> > }
> >
> > + if (optee_protmem_pool_init(optee))
> > + pr_info("Protected memory service not available\n");
> > +
> > /*
> > * Ensure that there are no pre-existing shm objects before enabling
> > * the shm cache so that there's no chance of receiving an invalid
> > @@ -1787,6 +1852,7 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > optee_disable_shm_cache(optee);
> > optee_smc_notif_uninit_irq(optee);
> > optee_unregister_devices();
> > + tee_device_unregister_all_dma_heaps(optee->teedev);
> > err_notif_uninit:
> > optee_notif_uninit(optee);
> > err_close_ctx:
> > @@ -1803,7 +1869,7 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > tee_device_unregister(optee->teedev);
> > err_free_optee:
> > kfree(optee);
> > -err_free_pool:
> > +err_free_shm_pool:
> > tee_shm_pool_free(pool);
> > if (memremaped_shm)
> > memunmap(memremaped_shm);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists