[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DAUM8B2ZUMFQ.25R95W7IDAEHM@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:20:48 +0200
From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
To: "Onur" <work@...rozkan.dev>
Cc: "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <ojeda@...nel.org>,
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, <gary@...yguo.net>, <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
<aliceryhl@...gle.com>, <tmgross@...ch.edu>, <dakr@...nel.org>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<longman@...hat.com>, <felipe_life@...e.com>, <daniel@...lak.dev>,
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, <simona@...ll.ch>, <airlied@...il.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <lyude@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] implement ww_mutex abstraction for the Rust tree
On Tue Jun 24, 2025 at 7:34 AM CEST, Onur wrote:
> Should we handle this in the initial implementation or leave it for
> follow-up patches after the core abstraction of ww_mutex has landed?
Since you're writing these abstractions specifically for usage in drm, I
think we should look at the intended use-cases there and then decide on
an API.
So maybe Lyude or Dave can chime in :)
If you (or someone else) have another user for this API that needs it
ASAP, then we can think about merging this and improve it later. But if
we don't have a user, then we shouldn't merge it anyways.
---
Cheers,
Benno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists