[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <425j7c6xvbbatdhxgjgjawzwfnjmjetg6rpnwfudbtg6qz6nay@dy5ldbuhtbvv>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:35:18 +0200
From: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...ux.intel.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: "Nirujogi, Pratap" <pnirujog@....com>,
Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@....com>, mchehab@...nel.org, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
hverkuil@...all.nl, bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org, krzk@...nel.org,
dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com, hdegoede@...hat.com, jai.luthra@...asonboard.com,
tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
benjamin.chan@....com, bin.du@....com, grosikop@....com, king.li@....com,
dantony@....com, vengutta@....com, Svetoslav.Stoilov@....com,
Yana.Zheleva@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND] media: i2c: Add OV05C10 camera sensor driver
Hi Laurent, Hi Pratap,
Thank you for the patch
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 01:05:03AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> (CC'ing Mehdi)
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 05:51:48PM -0400, Nirujogi, Pratap wrote:
> > On 6/16/2025 6:49 PM, Nirujogi, Pratap wrote:
> > >>> +static int ov05c10_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > >>> +{
> > >>> + struct ov05c10 *ov05c10;
> > >>> + u32 clkfreq;
> > >>> + int ret;
> > >>> +
> > >>> + ov05c10 = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*ov05c10),
> > >>> GFP_KERNEL);
> > >>> + if (!ov05c10)
> > >>> + return -ENOMEM;
> > >>> +
> > >>> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(&client->dev);
> > >>> +
> > >>> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "clock-frequency",
> > >>> &clkfreq);
> > >>> + if (ret)
> > >>> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, -EINVAL,
> > >>> + "fail to get clock freq\n");
> > >>
> > >> Let's try to land
> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20250521104115.176950-1-
> > >> mehdi.djait@...ux.intel.com/
> > >> and replace the code above with devm_v4l2_sensor_clk_get().
> > >>
> > > Ok, we will verify on our side.
> >
> > We tried using devm_v4l2_sensor_clk_get() and found its required to add
> > support for software_node to make it work with this driver.
>
> Why is that ?
>
> > Please refer
> > the changes below and let us know if these should be submitted as a
> > separate patch.
The helper is still not merged, so no patch is required.
I will see if a change is needed from the helper side or the OV05C10 side.
>
> Mehdi, do you have any comment ?
>
No comment for now: I will investigate this.
--
Kind Regards
Mehdi Djait
> > ---
> > @@ -645,16 +645,16 @@ struct clk *devm_v4l2_sensor_clk_get(struct device
> > *dev, const char *id)
> > const char *clk_id __free(kfree) = NULL;
> > struct clk_hw *clk_hw;
> > struct clk *clk;
> > - bool acpi_node;
> > + bool is_node;
> > u32 rate;
> > int ret;
> >
> > clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, id);
> > ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "clock-frequency", &rate);
> > - acpi_node = is_acpi_node(dev_fwnode(dev));
> > + is_node = is_acpi_node(dev_fwnode(dev)) ||
> > is_software_node(dev_fwnode(dev));
> >
> > if (clk) {
> > - if (!ret && acpi_node) {
> > + if (!ret && is_node) {
> > ret = clk_set_rate(clk, rate);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(dev, "Failed to set clock rate:
> > %u\n",
> > @@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ struct clk *devm_v4l2_sensor_clk_get(struct device
> > *dev, const char *id)
> > if (ret)
> > return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >
> > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) || !acpi_node)
> > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) || !is_node)
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> >
> > if (!id) {
> > ----
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists