[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025062457-uncouple-oncoming-f933@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 11:27:06 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/355] 5.10.239-rc1 review
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 01:56:56AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 at 18:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.239 release.
> > There are 355 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:05:51 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.239-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Regressions on arm64 tinyconfig builds with gcc-12 and clang failed on
> the Linux stable-rc 5.10.239-rc1.
>
> Regressions found on arm
> * arm64, build
> - clang-20-allnoconfig
> - clang-20-tinyconfig
> - gcc-12-allnoconfig
> - gcc-12-tinyconfig
> - gcc-8-allnoconfig
> - gcc-8-tinyconfig
>
>
> Regression Analysis:
> - New regression? Yes
> - Reproducibility? Yes
>
> Build regression: stable-rc 5.10.239-rc1 arm64 insn.h error use of
> undeclared identifier 'FAULT_BRK_IMM'
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
>
> ## Build errors
> arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h:573:9: error: use of undeclared
> identifier 'FAULT_BRK_IMM'
> 573 | return AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT;
> | ^
> arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h:26:54: note: expanded from macro
> 'AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT'
> 26 | #define AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT (AARCH64_BREAK_MON |
> (FAULT_BRK_IMM << 5))
> | ^
> arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h:583:9: error: use of undeclared
> identifier 'FAULT_BRK_IMM'
> 583 | return AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT;
> | ^
> arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h:26:54: note: expanded from macro
> 'AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT'
> 26 | #define AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT (AARCH64_BREAK_MON |
> (FAULT_BRK_IMM << 5))
> | ^
> 2 errors generated.
Now fixed, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists