[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFqTQtK8yCTlmEfx@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:00:02 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: move mask update out of the atomic context
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 11:40:05AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 24.06.25 11:37, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 09:45:34PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > ...
> > > Let's ask the real questions: who checks PGTBL_PTE_MODIFIED?
> > >
> > > I see
> > >
> > > if (mask & ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK)
> > > arch_sync_kernel_mappings(start, start + size);
> > >
> > > And then
> > >
> > > arch/arm/include/asm/page.h:#define ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK PGTBL_PMD_MODIFIED
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-2level_types.h:#define ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK PGTBL_PMD_MODIFIED
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level_types.h:#define ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK PGTBL_PMD_MODIFIED
> > >
> > >
> > > Which makes me wonder why we need PGTBL_PTE_MODIFIED at all? Is there some other check I am missing?
> > >
> > > (same question regarding everything excepy PGTBL_PMD_MODIFIED, because that actually seems to be used)
> >
> > AFAICT it was thought as architecture-specific:
> >
> > /*
> > * Architectures can set this mask to a combination of PGTBL_P?D_MODIFIED values
> > * and let generic vmalloc and ioremap code know when arch_sync_kernel_mappings()
> > * needs to be called.
> > */
> > #ifndef ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK
> > #define ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK 0
> > #endif
> >
> > Not sure if that needs to be addressed at all.
>
> Okay, if there are no users of PGTBL_PTE_MODIFIED we could just ... remove
> it. Dead code.
As you noticed, PGTBL_PMD_MODIFIED bit is used only. Thus, all other
bits would have to be removed as well, not just PGTBL_PTE_MODIFIED?
That is more or less revert of at least the below commits and rewriting
it in a PMD-focused manner:
2ba3e6947aed ("mm/vmalloc: track which page-table levels were modified")
d8626138009b ("mm: add functions to track page directory modifications")
That would be a completely different effort, which I am not aming at ;)
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists