[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <trwdfk2oz2udtbiqxh3ybuqbvasfqywmqxgi4xyvsknz6svs2r@icpp7snpq6c5>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 14:47:29 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/10] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: Add support for
dynamic update for slewing PLLs
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 04:13:26PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> The alpha PLLs which slew to a new frequency at runtime would require
> the PLL to calibrate at the mid point of the VCO. Add the new PLL ops
> which can support the slewing of the PLL to a new frequency.
>
> Reviewed-by: Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 170 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> index d8e1cd1263317814da2d0414600988de4b87c56f..354ebf48435f1ef7f76ead05e9ca882085dcc46d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> @@ -3017,3 +3017,172 @@ void qcom_clk_alpha_pll_configure(struct clk_alpha_pll *pll, struct regmap *regm
> }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_clk_alpha_pll_configure);
> +
> +static int clk_alpha_pll_slew_update(struct clk_alpha_pll *pll)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + regmap_set_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_UPDATE);
> + regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), &val);
> +
> + ret = wait_for_pll_update(pll);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + /*
> + * Hardware programming mandates a wait of at least 570ns before polling the LOCK
> + * detect bit. Have a delay of 1us just to be safe.
> + */
> + udelay(1);
> +
> + return wait_for_pll_enable_lock(pll);
> +}
> +
> +static int clk_alpha_pll_slew_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
> + const struct pll_vco *curr_vco, *vco;
> + unsigned long freq_hz;
> + u64 a;
> + u32 l;
> +
> + freq_hz = alpha_pll_round_rate(rate, parent_rate, &l, &a, ALPHA_REG_BITWIDTH);
> + if (freq_hz != rate) {
> + pr_err("alpha_pll: Call clk_set_rate with rounded rates!\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + curr_vco = alpha_pll_find_vco(pll, clk_hw_get_rate(hw));
> + if (!curr_vco) {
> + pr_err("alpha pll: not in a valid vco range\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + vco = alpha_pll_find_vco(pll, freq_hz);
> + if (!vco) {
> + pr_err("alpha pll: not in a valid vco range\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Dynamic pll update will not support switching frequencies across
> + * vco ranges. In those cases fall back to normal alpha set rate.
> + */
> + if (curr_vco->val != vco->val)
> + return clk_alpha_pll_set_rate(hw, rate, parent_rate);
> +
> + a <<= ALPHA_REG_BITWIDTH - ALPHA_BITWIDTH;
> +
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), l);
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), lower_32_bits(a));
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL_U(pll), upper_32_bits(a));
We have code that does this in __clk_alpha_pll_set_rate() and now you
are adding two more copies. Please extract PLL_L_VAL, PLL_ALPHA_VAL and
PLL_USER_CTL / PLL_VCO_MASK into a helper function.
> +
> + /* Ensure that the write above goes before slewing the PLL */
> + mb();
> +
> + if (clk_hw_is_enabled(hw))
> + return clk_alpha_pll_slew_update(pll);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Slewing plls should be bought up at frequency which is in the middle of the
> + * desired VCO range. So after bringing up the pll at calibration freq, set it
> + * back to desired frequency(that was set by previous clk_set_rate).
> + */
> +static int clk_alpha_pll_calibrate(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
> + struct clk_hw *parent;
> + const struct pll_vco *vco;
> + unsigned long calibration_freq, freq_hz;
> + u64 a;
> + u32 l;
> + int rc;
> +
> + parent = clk_hw_get_parent(hw);
> + if (!parent) {
> + pr_err("alpha pll: no valid parent found\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + vco = alpha_pll_find_vco(pll, clk_hw_get_rate(hw));
> + if (!vco) {
> + pr_err("alpha pll: not in a valid vco range\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * As during slewing plls vco_sel won't be allowed to change, vco table
> + * should have only one entry table, i.e. index = 0, find the
> + * calibration frequency.
> + */
> + calibration_freq = (pll->vco_table[0].min_freq + pll->vco_table[0].max_freq) / 2;
> +
> + freq_hz = alpha_pll_round_rate(calibration_freq, clk_hw_get_rate(parent),
> + &l, &a, ALPHA_REG_BITWIDTH);
> + if (freq_hz != calibration_freq) {
> + pr_err("alpha_pll: call clk_set_rate with rounded rates!\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Setup PLL for calibration frequency */
> + a <<= (ALPHA_REG_BITWIDTH - ALPHA_BITWIDTH);
> +
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), l);
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), lower_32_bits(a));
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL_U(pll), upper_32_bits(a));
> +
> + regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), PLL_VCO_MASK << PLL_VCO_SHIFT,
> + vco->val << PLL_VCO_SHIFT);
> +
> + /* Bringup the pll at calibration frequency */
> + rc = clk_alpha_pll_enable(hw);
> + if (rc) {
> + pr_err("alpha pll calibration failed\n");
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * PLL is already running at calibration frequency.
> + * So slew pll to the previously set frequency.
> + */
> + freq_hz = alpha_pll_round_rate(clk_hw_get_rate(hw),
> + clk_hw_get_rate(parent), &l, &a, ALPHA_REG_BITWIDTH);
> +
> + pr_debug("pll %s: setting back to required rate %lu, freq_hz %ld\n",
> + clk_hw_get_name(hw), clk_hw_get_rate(hw), freq_hz);
> +
> + /* Setup the PLL for the new frequency */
> + a <<= (ALPHA_REG_BITWIDTH - ALPHA_BITWIDTH);
> +
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), l);
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), lower_32_bits(a));
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL_U(pll), upper_32_bits(a));
> +
> + regmap_set_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), PLL_ALPHA_EN);
> +
> + return clk_alpha_pll_slew_update(pll);
> +}
> +
> +static int clk_alpha_pll_slew_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = clk_alpha_pll_calibrate(hw);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + return clk_alpha_pll_enable(hw);
> +}
> +
> +const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_slew_ops = {
> + .enable = clk_alpha_pll_slew_enable,
> + .disable = clk_alpha_pll_disable,
> + .recalc_rate = clk_alpha_pll_recalc_rate,
> + .round_rate = clk_alpha_pll_round_rate,
> + .set_rate = clk_alpha_pll_slew_set_rate,
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_alpha_pll_slew_ops);
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h
> index 7f35aaa7a35d88411beb11fd2be5d5dd5bfbe066..ff41aeab0ab9844cd4e43c9b8e1ba0b50205e48e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h
> @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ extern const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_rivian_evo_ops;
> #define clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_rivian_evo_ops clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_ops
>
> extern const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_regera_ops;
> +extern const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_slew_ops;
>
> void clk_alpha_pll_configure(struct clk_alpha_pll *pll, struct regmap *regmap,
> const struct alpha_pll_config *config);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists