lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <175086216755.125160.10337591577571856214.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 15:36:07 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, 
 patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shengjiu.wang@...il.com, 
 Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: wm8524: enable constraints when sysclk is
 configured.

On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:14:03 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> In some cases, the sysclk won't be configured on init, and sysclk can be
> changed in hw_params() according to different sample rate, for example,
> for 44kHz sample rate, the sysclk is 11.2896MHz, for 48kHz sample rate,
> the sysclk is 12.288MHz.
> 
> In order to support the above case, only enable constraints when sysclk
> is configured, and check the rate in hw_params.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: wm8524: enable constraints when sysclk is configured.
      commit: 17cc308b183308bf5ada36e164284fff7eb064ba

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ