[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB52766D0C0B12F1F10A6BE7548C7BA@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 03:38:19 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, "jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>
CC: "bagasdotme@...il.com" <bagasdotme@...il.com>, "robin.murphy@....com"
<robin.murphy@....com>, "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>, "vdumpa@...dia.com"
<vdumpa@...dia.com>, "jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>, "jsnitsel@...hat.com"
<jsnitsel@...hat.com>, "nathan@...nel.org" <nathan@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "Liu, Yi L"
<yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "mshavit@...gle.com" <mshavit@...gle.com>,
"praan@...gle.com" <praan@...gle.com>, "zhangzekun11@...wei.com"
<zhangzekun11@...wei.com>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>, "mochs@...dia.com" <mochs@...dia.com>,
"alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com" <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>, "vasant.hegde@....com"
<vasant.hegde@....com>, "dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 06/25] iommufd/access: Allow access->ops to be NULL for
internal use
> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2025 3:15 PM
>
> +int iommufd_access_notify_unmap(struct io_pagetable *iopt, unsigned long
> iova,
> + unsigned long length)
> {
> struct iommufd_ioas *ioas =
> container_of(iopt, struct iommufd_ioas, iopt);
> struct iommufd_access *access;
> unsigned long index;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> xa_lock(&ioas->iopt.access_list);
> xa_for_each(&ioas->iopt.access_list, index, access) {
> + if (!access->ops || !access->ops->unmap) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
then accesses before this one have been notified to unpin the area
while accesses afterwards are left unnotified.
in the end the unmap fails but with some side-effect incurred.
I'm not sure whether this intermediate state may lead to any undesired
effect later. Just raise it in case you or Jason already thought about it.
> /* Something is not responding to unmap requests.
> */
> tries++;
> - if (WARN_ON(tries > 100))
> - return -EDEADLOCK;
> + if (WARN_ON(tries > 100)) {
> + rc = -EDEADLOCK;
> + goto out_unmapped;
> + }
this looks an unrelated fix?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists