[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a55vag0l.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:27:06 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com>
Cc: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, DOC ML <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, KERNEL
ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: standardize git.kernel.org URLs
Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com> writes:
> replace https: with git:, delete trailing /, and identify repos as "git"
>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> (maintainer:DOCUMENTATION)
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: DOC ML <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org> (open list:DOCUMENTATION)
> Cc: KERNEL ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> (open list)
> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
So ... we're changing GitHub URLs from git: to https:, and Gitlab URLs
from https: to git:?
Certainly we want to fix URLs that are broken, but is there any real
reason to churn up the MAINTAINERS file to "fix" URLs that work?
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists