linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/222] 5.4.295-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvNTO2kObFG9RcOOAkGrRa7rgTw+5P3gmbfzuodVj6owQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:03:22 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, 
	shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, 
	pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, 
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, 
	conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, 
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, 
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, 
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/222] 5.4.295-rc1 review

On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 15:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:46:15AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 at 18:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.295 release.
> > > There are 222 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:05:50 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.295-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Regressions on arm defconfig builds with gcc-12 and clang failed on
> > the Linux stable-rc 5.4.295-rc1.
> >
> > Regressions found on arm
> > * arm, build
> >   - clang-20-axm55xx_defconfig
> >   - clang-20-defconfig
> >   - clang-20-lkftconfig
> >   - clang-20-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag
> >   - clang-nightly-axm55xx_defconfig
> >   - clang-nightly-defconfig
> >   - clang-nightly-lkftconfig
> >   - gcc-12-axm55xx_defconfig
> >   - gcc-12-defconfig
> >   - gcc-12-lkftconfig
> >   - gcc-12-lkftconfig-debug
> >   - gcc-12-lkftconfig-kasan
> >   - gcc-12-lkftconfig-kunit
> >   - gcc-12-lkftconfig-libgpiod
> >   - gcc-12-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag
> >   - gcc-12-lkftconfig-perf
> >   - gcc-12-lkftconfig-rcutorture
> >   - gcc-8-axm55xx_defconfig
> >   - gcc-8-defconfig
> >
> > Regression Analysis:
> >  - New regression? Yes
> >  - Reproducibility? Yes
> >
> > Build regression: stable-rc 5.4.295-rc1 arm kvm init.S Error selected
> > processor does not support `eret' in ARM mode
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> >
> >
> > ## Build errors
> > arch/arm/kvm/init.S: Assembler messages:
> > arch/arm/kvm/init.S:109: Error: selected processor does not support
> > `eret' in ARM mode
> > arch/arm/kvm/init.S:116: Error: Banked registers are not available
> > with this architecture. -- `msr ELR_hyp,r1'
> > arch/arm/kvm/init.S:145: Error: selected processor does not support
> > `eret' in ARM mode
> > arch/arm/kvm/init.S:149: Error: selected processor does not support
> > `eret' in ARM mode
> > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:345: arch/arm/kvm/init.o] Error 1
> >
> > and
> > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s: Assembler messages:
> > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s:45: Error: selected processor does not support `smc
> > #0' in ARM mode
> > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s:94: Error: selected processor does not support `smc
> > #0' in ARM mode
> > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s:160: Error: selected processor does not support `smc
> > #0' in ARM mode
> > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s:296: Error: selected processor does not support `smc
> > #0' in ARM mode
> > make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:262:
> > drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-32.o] Error 1
>
> That's odd, both clang and gcc don't like this?  Any chance you can do
> 'git bisect' to track down the offending commit?

The git bisection pointing to,

  kbuild: Update assembler calls to use proper flags and language target
  commit d5c8d6e0fa61401a729e9eb6a9c7077b2d3aebb0 upstream.

- Naresh

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h