linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/352] 5.10.239-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYse3W=-C0JbR6fhw=PLPy4aWUFqPwPTD0eK+x0sLidxYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 01:32:27 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/352] 5.10.239-rc2 review

On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 17:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.239 release.
> There are 352 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 26 Jun 2025 12:13:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.239-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Regressions noticed on arm64 allyesconfig build with gcc-12 on the
stable-rc 5.10.239-rc2.
(this allyesconfig build was skipped on rc1 due to other build regressions)

This was reported on stable-rc 5.15.186-rc1 with bisection results.
  randstruct: gcc-plugin: Remove bogus void member
  [ Upstream commit e136a4062174a9a8d1c1447ca040ea81accfa6a8 ]

Test environments:
 - arm64

Regression Analysis:
 - New regression? Yes
 - Reproducibility? Yes

Build regression: stable-rc 5.10.239-rc2 qedf_main.c field name not in
record or union initializer

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

## Build log
drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:695:9: note: (near initialization for
'qedf_cb_ops.get_login_failures')
drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:696:17: error: field name not in record
or union initializer
  696 |                 .link_update = qedf_link_update,
      |                 ^

## Build log
 * Build logs: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/api/testruns/28858666/log_file/
 * Build link: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2yxHG0IfVj37DNnB0QgFB8uKDn2/
 * Build config:
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2yxHG0IfVj37DNnB0QgFB8uKDn2/config
 * Build details:
https://regressions.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/v5.10.238-353-g9dc843c66f6f/build/gcc-12-allyesconfig/

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.239-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 9dc843c66f6f9281a760618b9967c74c86438b6a
* git describe: v5.10.238-353-g9dc843c66f6f
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.238-353-g9dc843c66f6f

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.237-271-g8bfb88108193)
* arm64, build
  - gcc-12-allyesconfig

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.237-271-g8bfb88108193)

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.237-271-g8bfb88108193)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.237-271-g8bfb88108193)

## Test result summary
total: 37161, pass: 28448, fail: 1823, skip: 6742, xfail: 148

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 100 total, 100 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 28 total, 27 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org