[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFx7ix0uikB8dkm4@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 23:43:23 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com>
Cc: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>,
Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>,
Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lakshmi Sowjanya D <quic_laksd@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] spi: spi-qpic-snand: avoid memory corruption
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 10:22:48PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:
> The 'spi-qpic-nand' driver may cause memory corruption under some
> circumstances. The first patch in the series changes the driver to
> avoid that, whereas the second adds some sanity checks to the common
> QPIC code in order to make detecting such errors easier in the future.
>
> Preferably, the two patches should go along in via the SPI tree.
> It is not a strict requirement though, in the case the second patch
> gets included separately through the MTD tree it reveals the bug
> which is fixed in the first patch.
Miquel, are you OK with this plan for merging via the SPI tree?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists