linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [v2] x86/fpu: Delay instruction pointer fixup until after warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7ad78deb-82fe-4154-b433-f789d97d370e@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:21:00 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
 bp@...en8.de, mingo@...nel.org, chao.gao@...el.com,
 Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
 "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>, Eric Biggers
 <ebiggers@...gle.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] x86/fpu: Delay instruction pointer fixup until after
 warning

On 6/25/25 01:57, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 02:01:48PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> Changes from v1:
>>  * Fix minor typos
>>  * Use the more generic and standard ex_handler_default(). Had the
>>    original code used this helper, the bug would not have been there
>>    in the first place.
> Doesn't this here typically go under the --- with the diffstat etc?

I always put it first because it's the first thing I want the reviewers
to see. I don't like the idea of burying it.

But maybe I'm weird.