[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac8efa08-3f85-4532-8762-573ebd258ca7@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:56:48 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, pratyush@...nel.org,
jasonmiu@...gle.com, graf@...zon.com, changyuanl@...gle.com,
rppt@...nel.org, dmatlack@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, corbet@....net,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, kanie@...ux.alibaba.com, ojeda@...nel.org,
aliceryhl@...gle.com, masahiroy@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tj@...nel.org, yoann.congal@...le.fr, mmaurer@...gle.com,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, chenridong@...wei.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
mark.rutland@....com, jannh@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
joel.granados@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, anna.schumaker@...cle.com,
song@...nel.org, zhangguopeng@...inos.cn, linux@...ssschuh.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
rafael@...nel.org, dakr@...nel.org, bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org,
cw00.choi@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, yesanishhere@...il.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, leon@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, wagi@...nel.org, djeffery@...hat.com,
stuart.w.hayes@...il.com, ptyadav@...zon.de, lennart@...ttering.net,
brauner@...nel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/32] kho: warn if KHO is disabled due to an error
On 6/25/25 4:17 PM, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> During boot scratch area is allocated based on command line
> parameters or auto calculated. However, scratch area may fail
> to allocate, and in that case KHO is disabled. Currently,
> no warning is printed that KHO is disabled, which makes it
> confusing for the end user to figure out why KHO is not
> available. Add the missing warning message.
Are users even going to know what "KHO" means in the warning message?
>
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
> ---
> kernel/kexec_handover.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_handover.c b/kernel/kexec_handover.c
> index 1ff6b242f98c..069d5890841c 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_handover.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_handover.c
> @@ -565,6 +565,7 @@ static void __init kho_reserve_scratch(void)
> err_free_scratch_desc:
> memblock_free(kho_scratch, kho_scratch_cnt * sizeof(*kho_scratch));
> err_disable_kho:
> + pr_warn("Failed to reserve scratch area, disabling KHO\n");
> kho_enable = false;
> }
>
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists