lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250625172122.ad1e955ae2bc3957d9fb8546@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:21:22 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 x86@...nel.org, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song
 <yhs@...com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Hao Luo
 <haoluo@...gle.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>, David Laight
 <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>, Thomas Weißschuh
 <thomas@...ch.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 perf/core 08/22] uprobes/x86: Add mapping for
 optimized uprobe trampolines

On Thu,  5 Jun 2025 15:23:35 +0200
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:

> Adding support to add special mapping for user space trampoline with
> following functions:
> 
>   uprobe_trampoline_get - find or add uprobe_trampoline
>   uprobe_trampoline_put - remove or destroy uprobe_trampoline
> 
> The user space trampoline is exported as arch specific user space special
> mapping through tramp_mapping, which is initialized in following changes
> with new uprobe syscall.
> 
> The uprobe trampoline needs to be callable/reachable from the probed address,
> so while searching for available address we use is_reachable_by_call function
> to decide if the uprobe trampoline is callable from the probe address.
> 
> All uprobe_trampoline objects are stored in uprobes_state object and are
> cleaned up when the process mm_struct goes down. Adding new arch hooks
> for that, because this change is x86_64 specific.
> 
> Locking is provided by callers in following changes.
> 
> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/uprobes.h   |   6 ++
>  kernel/events/uprobes.c   |  10 ++++
>  kernel/fork.c             |   1 +
>  4 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> index 77050e5a4680..0295cfb625c0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -608,6 +608,121 @@ static void riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  		*sr = utask->autask.saved_scratch_register;
>  	}
>  }
> +
> +static int tramp_mremap(const struct vm_special_mapping *sm, struct vm_area_struct *new_vma)
> +{
> +	return -EPERM;
> +}
> +
> +static struct page *tramp_mapping_pages[2] __ro_after_init;
> +
> +static struct vm_special_mapping tramp_mapping = {
> +	.name   = "[uprobes-trampoline]",
> +	.mremap = tramp_mremap,
> +	.pages  = tramp_mapping_pages,
> +};
> +
> +struct uprobe_trampoline {
> +	struct hlist_node	node;
> +	unsigned long		vaddr;
> +};
> +
> +static bool is_reachable_by_call(unsigned long vtramp, unsigned long vaddr)
> +{
> +	long delta = (long)(vaddr + 5 - vtramp);
> +
> +	return delta >= INT_MIN && delta <= INT_MAX;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long find_nearest_page(unsigned long vaddr)

nit: this does not return the nearest one, but the highest one?

If you really need the nearest one, we need to call
vm_unmapped_area() twice.

[low_limit, call_end] with TOPDOWN flag and 
[call_end, high_limit] without TOPDOWN.

and choose the nearest one. But I don't think we need it.

> +{
> +	struct vm_unmapped_area_info info = {
> +		.length     = PAGE_SIZE,
> +		.align_mask = ~PAGE_MASK,
> +		.flags      = VM_UNMAPPED_AREA_TOPDOWN,
> +		.low_limit  = PAGE_SIZE,
> +		.high_limit = ULONG_MAX,

Maybe "TASK_SIZE" is better than ULONG_MAX?

> +	};
> +	unsigned long limit, call_end = vaddr + 5;
> +
> +	if (!check_add_overflow(call_end, INT_MIN, &limit))
> +		info.low_limit = limit;
> +	if (!check_add_overflow(call_end, INT_MAX, &limit))
> +		info.high_limit = limit;
> +	return vm_unmapped_area(&info);
> +}
> +
> +static struct uprobe_trampoline *create_uprobe_trampoline(unsigned long vaddr)
> +{
> +	struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> +	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> +	struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +
> +	if (!user_64bit_mode(regs))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	vaddr = find_nearest_page(vaddr);
> +	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(vaddr))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	tramp = kzalloc(sizeof(*tramp), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (unlikely(!tramp))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	tramp->vaddr = vaddr;
> +	vma = _install_special_mapping(mm, tramp->vaddr, PAGE_SIZE,

Just make sure, this special mapped page is mapped 1 page for each
uprobe? (I think uprobe syscall trampoline size is far smaller
than the page size.)

> +				VM_READ|VM_EXEC|VM_MAYEXEC|VM_MAYREAD|VM_DONTCOPY|VM_IO,
> +				&tramp_mapping);
> +	if (IS_ERR(vma))
> +		goto free_area;

nit: To simplify the code, instead of goto,

if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
	kfree(tramp);
	return NULL;
}

> +	return tramp;
> +
> +free_area:
> +	kfree(tramp);
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +__maybe_unused
> +static struct uprobe_trampoline *get_uprobe_trampoline(unsigned long vaddr, bool *new)
> +{
> +	struct uprobes_state *state = &current->mm->uprobes_state;
> +	struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp = NULL;
> +
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(tramp, &state->head_tramps, node) {
> +		if (is_reachable_by_call(tramp->vaddr, vaddr))

This should set '*new = false;' here.

> +			return tramp;
> +	}
> +
> +	tramp = create_uprobe_trampoline(vaddr);
> +	if (!tramp)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	*new = true;
> +	hlist_add_head(&tramp->node, &state->head_tramps);
> +	return tramp;
> +}
> +
> +static void destroy_uprobe_trampoline(struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp)
> +{
> +	hlist_del(&tramp->node);
> +	kfree(tramp);

Don't we need to unmap the tramp->vaddr?

> +}
> +
> +void arch_uprobe_init_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&mm->uprobes_state.head_tramps);
> +}
> +
> +void arch_uprobe_clear_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +	struct uprobes_state *state = &mm->uprobes_state;
> +	struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp;
> +	struct hlist_node *n;
> +
> +	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(tramp, n, &state->head_tramps, node)
> +		destroy_uprobe_trampoline(tramp);
> +}
>  #else /* 32-bit: */
>  /*
>   * No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit
> diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> index 5080619560d4..b40d33aae016 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/wait.h>
>  #include <linux/timer.h>
>  #include <linux/seqlock.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>  
>  struct uprobe;
>  struct vm_area_struct;
> @@ -185,6 +186,9 @@ struct xol_area;
>  
>  struct uprobes_state {
>  	struct xol_area		*xol_area;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64

Maybe we can introduce struct arch_uprobe_state{} here?

> +	struct hlist_head	head_tramps;
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  typedef int (*uprobe_write_verify_t)(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr,
> @@ -233,6 +237,8 @@ extern void uprobe_handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  extern void *arch_uretprobe_trampoline(unsigned long *psize);
>  extern unsigned long uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr(void);
>  extern void uprobe_copy_from_page(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr, void *dst, int len);
> +extern void arch_uprobe_clear_state(struct mm_struct *mm);
> +extern void arch_uprobe_init_state(struct mm_struct *mm);
>  #else /* !CONFIG_UPROBES */
>  struct uprobes_state {
>  };
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 6795b8d82b9c..acec91a676b7 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -1802,6 +1802,14 @@ static struct xol_area *get_xol_area(void)
>  	return area;
>  }
>  
> +void __weak arch_uprobe_clear_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void __weak arch_uprobe_init_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * uprobe_clear_state - Free the area allocated for slots.
>   */
> @@ -1813,6 +1821,8 @@ void uprobe_clear_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	delayed_uprobe_remove(NULL, mm);
>  	mutex_unlock(&delayed_uprobe_lock);
>  
> +	arch_uprobe_clear_state(mm);
> +
>  	if (!area)
>  		return;
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 1ee8eb11f38b..7108ca558518 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1010,6 +1010,7 @@ static void mm_init_uprobes_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
>  	mm->uprobes_state.xol_area = NULL;
> +	arch_uprobe_init_state(mm);
>  #endif

Can't we make this uprobe_init_state(mm)?

>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

Thank you,


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ