[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025062511-tutor-judiciary-e3f9@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:25:29 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/588] 6.15.4-rc2 review
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 10:00:56AM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> (cc: Christian Brauner>
>
> Since 6.15.4-rc1 I noticed that some KDE apps (kded6, kate (the text editor))
> started going into a tailspin with 100% per-process CPU.
>
> The symptom is 100% reproducible: open a new file with kate, save empty file,
> make changes, save, watch CPU go 100%. perf top shows copy_to_user running wild.
>
> First I tried to reproduce on 6.15.3 - no problem, everything works fine.
>
> After checking the list of patches for 6.15.4 I reverted the anon_inode series
> (all 3 for the first attempt) and the problem is gone.
>
> Will try to reduce further & can gladly try additional fixes, but for now
> I'd say these patches are not yet suitable for stable.
Does this same issue also happen for you on 6.16-rc3?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists