[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFu1DC4eGtYmAuSf@shepard>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:36:28 +0200
From: Paul Kocialkowski <paulk@...-base.io>
To: Kuba SzczodrzyĆski <kuba@...zodrzynski.pl>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/sun4i: Support LVDS using MIPI DSI combo D-PHY
On Wed 25 Jun 25, 10:03, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> On Fri 21 Feb 25, 17:17, Kuba SzczodrzyĆski wrote:
> > @@ -183,6 +184,8 @@ static void sun4i_tcon_lvds_set_status(struct sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> > } else {
> > regmap_update_bits(tcon->regs, SUN4I_TCON0_LVDS_IF_REG,
> > SUN4I_TCON0_LVDS_IF_EN, 0);
>
> Does the T113-S3/D1 also have LVDS support in TCON regsiters?
> My understanding is that it only has the combo-phy, so this register write
> should not take place.
>
> I think it would be easier to just move this to a common callback for users of
> the tcon0 lvds phy and always call
Nevermind this comment, the LVDS_IF writes are actually necessary and
independent from the LVDS PHY configuration.
All the best,
Paul
--
Paul Kocialkowski,
Independent contractor - sys-base - https://www.sys-base.io/
Free software developer - https://www.paulk.fr/
Expert in multimedia, graphics and embedded hardware support with Linux.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists