[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW7WY54jYDBtApRRw4mnjM0cZu4GBUZQ58ZHAV+zd79uXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 07:55:28 -0700
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org, jikos@...nel.org,
mbenes@...e.cz, pmladek@...e.com, joe.lawrence@...hat.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, dylanbhatch@...gle.com, fj6611ie@...jp.fujitsu.com,
mark.rutland@....com, kernel-team@...a.com,
Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@...zon.com>, Torsten Duwe <duwe@...e.de>, Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: Implement HAVE_LIVEPATCH
Hi Will,
Thanks for your kind review!
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 6:21 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 10:37:34AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > This is largely based on [1] by Suraj Jitindar Singh.
>
> I think it would be useful to preserve at least some parts of the
> original commit message here so that folks don't have to pull it out
> of the list archives if they want to see more about the rationale.
The relevant message from the original commit message is:
Allocate a task flag used to represent the patch pending state for the
task.
Shall I respin this patch to add this? Or maybe Catalin can add
this while applying the patch?
Thanks,
Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists