[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aF2Em76RGWVpJfg-@vaman>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 10:34:19 -0700
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Rodrigo Gobbi <rodrigo.gobbi.7@...il.com>
Cc: yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com, pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.dev,
sanyog.r.kale@...el.com, ~lkcamp/patches@...ts.sr.ht,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soundwire: debugfs: move debug statement outside of
error handling
On 21-06-25, 16:09, Rodrigo Gobbi wrote:
> The start_t and finish_t variables are not properly initialized
> if errors happens over request_firmware actions.
> This was also detected by smatch:
>
> drivers/soundwire/debugfs.c:301 cmd_go() error: uninitialized symbol 'finish_t'.
> drivers/soundwire/debugfs.c:301 cmd_go() error: uninitialized symbol 'start_t'.
>
> Initialize those variables and move the debug statement outside of
> firmware error handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Gobbi <rodrigo.gobbi.7@...il.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sound/0db6d0bf-7bac-43a7-b624-a00d3d2bf829@stanley.mountain/
> Fixes: bb5cb09eedce ("soundwire: debugfs: add interface for BPT/BRA transfers")
> ---
> @Vinod Koul, tks for the suggestion. I`ve kept the ktime_t initialization, after moving
> the debug statement, they are not actually needed, but I think there is no harm to keep that.
> Tks and regards.
Thanks, but I guess lets avoid superfluous initialization. we should
drop this as well
>
> Changelog:
> v2: moving debug statement
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sound/20250617015230.54981-1-rodrigo.gobbi.7@gmail.com/#t
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/debugfs.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/debugfs.c b/drivers/soundwire/debugfs.c
> index 3099ea074f10..42d2aba285f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/debugfs.c
> @@ -237,8 +237,8 @@ static int cmd_go(void *data, u64 value)
> {
> const struct firmware *fw = NULL;
> struct sdw_slave *slave = data;
> - ktime_t start_t;
> - ktime_t finish_t;
> + ktime_t start_t = 0;
> + ktime_t finish_t = 0;
> int ret;
>
> if (value != 1)
> @@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ static int cmd_go(void *data, u64 value)
>
> finish_t = ktime_get();
>
> + dev_dbg(&slave->dev, "command completed, num_byte %zu status %d, time %lld ms\n",
> + num_bytes, ret, div_u64(finish_t - start_t, NSEC_PER_MSEC));
> +
> out:
> if (fw)
> release_firmware(fw);
> @@ -298,9 +301,6 @@ static int cmd_go(void *data, u64 value)
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&slave->dev);
> pm_runtime_put(&slave->dev);
>
> - dev_dbg(&slave->dev, "command completed, num_byte %zu status %d, time %lld ms\n",
> - num_bytes, ret, div_u64(finish_t - start_t, NSEC_PER_MSEC));
> -
> return ret;
> }
> DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(cmd_go_fops, NULL,
> --
> 2.49.0
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists