linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25 (drivers/gpu/drm/{i915,xe}/intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <v7cozjpsggel5uzg5krdork42k4tqnefn5tqs6lxdjqvbnyzp2@65nioys2ix64>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 14:15:26 -0500
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Linux Next Mailing List
	<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux DRI Development
	<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	<intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25
 (drivers/gpu/drm/{i915,xe}/intel_pcode.o)

On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 08:57:40PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
>On 6/25/25 12:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20250624:
>>
>
>on i386, when both CONFIG_DRM_XE=y
>and CONFIG_DRM_I915=y:
>
>ld: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.o: in function `intel_pcode_read':
>xe_pcode.c:(.text+0x7d0): multiple definition of `intel_pcode_read'; drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.o:intel_pcode.c:(.text+0x990): first defined here
>ld: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.o: in function `intel_pcode_write_timeout':
>xe_pcode.c:(.text+0x850): multiple definition of `intel_pcode_write_timeout'; drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.o:intel_pcode.c:(.text+0x9b0): first defined here
>ld: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.o: in function `intel_pcode_request':
>xe_pcode.c:(.text+0x8f0): multiple definition of `intel_pcode_request'; drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.o:intel_pcode.c:(.text+0x9d0): first defined here

not exclusive to i386... the pcode part used to be guarded by
CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY, but that is broken now. Possible fix discussed
in https://lore.kernel.org/intel-xe/gbisrh7ep2gn2fxv7xz4g4sy75qjpmcr5yqdx5atlab2oxevlx@j3zwx3k4o4x4/

Lucas De Marchi


>
>
>-- 
>~Randy
>