[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a6d0684-3340-43ed-b520-933654515943@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:28:01 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@...il.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH v4 0/2] PM: sleep: Handle async suppliers like
parents and async consumers like children
On 6/26/2025 4:46 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 at 14:55, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> These two patches complement the recently made PM core changes related to
>> the async suspend and resume of devices. They should apply on top of
>> 6.16-rc3.
>>
>> They were sent along with the other changes mentioned above:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2229735.Mh6RI2rZIc@rjwysocki.net/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2651185.Lt9SDvczpP@rjwysocki.net/
>>
>> (and this is v4 because they have been rebased in the meantime), but they don't
>> make any difference on my test-bed x86 systems, so I'd appreciate a confirmation
>> that they are actually needed on ARM (or another architecture using DT).
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> I haven't yet got the time to test these, but the code looks good to
> me, so feel free to add for the series:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
I passed this series to some internal guys to test on a wide variety of
AMD x86 hardware. The initial testing looks good.
Will keep you apprised if anything pops up.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists