[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFzj1LxEbxa3rHhD@trex>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:08:20 +0200
From: Jorge Ramirez <jorge.ramirez@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Jorge Ramirez <jorge.ramirez@....qualcomm.com>, quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com,
quic_dikshita@...cinc.com, bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org,
mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] media: dt-bindings: venus: Add qcm2290 dt schema
On 24/06/25 08:03:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/06/2025 14:24, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
> > On 23/06/25 13:49:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 23/06/2025 12:51, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> >>> Add a schema for the venus video encoder/decoder on the qcm2290.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez@....qualcomm.com>
> >>> ---
> >> Don't send multiple versions per day and allow other to actually perform
> >> review of your patchset instead of sending for every little thing.
> >
> > No. this is not what this was about - I already explained to you the
> > call I chose to make. You can disagree but you should not misrepresent
> > it.
>
>
> No, you did not explain me anything. You sent v4 with only one little
> change:
> "Changes since v3:
> - Fixed schema commit subject."
um, I dont want to delve in this (only because the conversation takes
longer than actual changes but just to close the loop), I did acknowledge
that you had trouble receiving my patches - since they were threaded -
and that I would be respining on the same day in case others were having
the same issue.
>
> The same day, also skipping review.
yep. will repost later today and thanks for the persistance (dont think
I dont value it!).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists