[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9cb6b7ad-387d-4a0d-9792-25cbbdc6dfed@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:25:52 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>, Aishwarya
<aishwarya.tcv@....com>
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, andersson@...nel.org,
bvanassche@....org, dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com, kishon@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
quic_cang@...cinc.com, quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com, vkoul@...nel.org,
broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 10/10] scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off
calls
On 21.06.2025 19:15, Nitin Rawat wrote:
>
> On 6/21/2025 3:14 AM, Aishwarya wrote:
>> Hi Nitin,
>>
>> To clarify — the defconfig kernel does boot successfully on our Arm64
>> Qualcomm platforms (RB5 and DB845C). However, starting from
>> next-20250613, we are seeing the following three test failures in the
>> `bootrr` baseline test in our CI environment:
>>
>> - baseline.bootrr.scsi-disk-device0-probed
>> - dmesg.alert
>> - dmesg.emerg
>>
>
> Hi Aishwarya,
>
> Thanks for testing and reporting this issue. Can you please
> test with the attached fix and let me know if it helps.
>
I also stepped into this issue on the RB5 board and I confirm that that
patch fixes it. Thanks!
Feel free to add:
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> ...
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists