[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <013baf358a7cfb958df6e44df0ccd518470a4d39.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:05:53 +0000
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "Hansen, Dave"
<dave.hansen@...el.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>, "Edgecombe, Rick P"
<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org"
<x86@...nel.org>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "Zhao, Yan Y"
<yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev"
<linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 01/12] x86/tdx: Consolidate TDX error handling
On Wed, 2025-06-25 at 10:58 -0700, Hansen, Dave wrote:
> > -/*
> > - * TDX module SEAMCALL leaf function error codes
> > - */
> > -#define TDX_SUCCESS 0ULL
> > -#define TDX_RND_NO_ENTROPY 0x8000020300000000ULL
>
> Kai, you were responsible for this nugget. What do you think of this patch?
(sorry for getting into this late)
I am 100% with consolidating TDX definitions across KVM and the core kernel,
so thanks Kirill for doing this.
But as you suggested, I think it's better to split this patch into two:
- One patch to just move error code from tdx_error.h in KVM and TDX guest
code to <asm/tdx_error.h>.
- One patch to further introduce those helpers (tdx_rnd_no_entropy() etc)
and actually use them in the code.
It will be easier to review anyway.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists