[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ecv628g0.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 10:50:07 +0200
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
To: "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
<lkmm@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, "Miguel Ojeda"
<ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Gary Guo"
<gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno
Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>, "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "Danilo Krummrich"
<dakr@...nel.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@...nel.org>, "Peter Zijlstra"
<peterz@...radead.org>, "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>, "Wedson
Almeida Filho" <wedsonaf@...il.com>, "Viresh Kumar"
<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, "Lyude Paul" <lyude@...hat.com>, "Ingo
Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>, "Mitchell Levy" <levymitchell0@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Linus Torvalds"
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] rust: sync: Add basic atomic operation mapping
framework
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com> writes:
> Preparation for generic atomic implementation. To unify the
> implementation of a generic method over `i32` and `i64`, the C side
> atomic methods need to be grouped so that in a generic method, they can
> be referred as <type>::<method>, otherwise their parameters and return
> value are different between `i32` and `i64`, which would require using
> `transmute()` to unify the type into a `T`.
>
> Introduce `AtomicImpl` to represent a basic type in Rust that has the
> direct mapping to an atomic implementation from C. This trait is sealed,
> and currently only `i32` and `i64` impl this.
>
> Further, different methods are put into different `*Ops` trait groups,
> and this is for the future when smaller types like `i8`/`i16` are
> supported but only with a limited set of API (e.g. only set(), load(),
> xchg() and cmpxchg(), no add() or sub() etc).
>
> While the atomic mod is introduced, documentation is also added for
> memory models and data races.
>
> Also bump my role to the maintainer of ATOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE to reflect
> my responsiblity on the Rust atomic mod.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 4 +-
> rust/kernel/sync.rs | 1 +
> rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs | 19 ++++
> rust/kernel/sync/atomic/ops.rs | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs
> create mode 100644 rust/kernel/sync/atomic/ops.rs
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 0c1d245bf7b8..5eef524975ca 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -3894,7 +3894,7 @@ F: drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> ATOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE
> M: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> M: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> -R: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> +M: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> R: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> L: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> S: Maintained
> @@ -3903,6 +3903,8 @@ F: arch/*/include/asm/atomic*.h
> F: include/*/atomic*.h
> F: include/linux/refcount.h
> F: scripts/atomic/
> +F: rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs
> +F: rust/kernel/sync/atomic/
>
> ATTO EXPRESSSAS SAS/SATA RAID SCSI DRIVER
> M: Bradley Grove <linuxdrivers@...otech.com>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync.rs b/rust/kernel/sync.rs
> index 36a719015583..b620027e0641 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/sync.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync.rs
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> use pin_init;
>
> mod arc;
> +pub mod atomic;
> mod condvar;
> pub mod lock;
> mod locked_by;
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..65e41dba97b7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic.rs
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +//! Atomic primitives.
> +//!
> +//! These primitives have the same semantics as their C counterparts: and the precise definitions of
> +//! semantics can be found at [`LKMM`]. Note that Linux Kernel Memory (Consistency) Model is the
> +//! only model for Rust code in kernel, and Rust's own atomics should be avoided.
> +//!
> +//! # Data races
> +//!
> +//! [`LKMM`] atomics have different rules regarding data races:
> +//!
> +//! - A normal write from C side is treated as an atomic write if
> +//! CONFIG_KCSAN_ASSUME_PLAIN_WRITES_ATOMIC=y.
> +//! - Mixed-size atomic accesses don't cause data races.
> +//!
> +//! [`LKMM`]: srctree/tools/memory-mode/
Typo in the link destination.
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists