[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adc13cb2-7a50-4ec3-91e7-ae435459fdc2@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 11:30:05 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
"Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>,
Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
kernel@....qualcomm.com, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for IQ-8275-evk board
On 26/06/2025 10:51, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/' for 20250623130420.3981916-1-umang.chheda@....qualcomm.com:
>>>>
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-gt58.dtb: panel@0 (samsung,lsl080al03): 'port' does not match any of the regexes: '^pinctrl-[0-9]+$'
>>>> from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/panel/samsung,s6d7aa0.yaml#
>>>
>>> Seems like a fluke..
>> No, it is a correct report. Schema does not allow port and needs to be
>> fixed.
>>
>> What's more, this would be pointed out if contributor checked their DTS,
>> so obviously this never happened.
>>
>> Internal guideline already asks for it, we asked for it, so why this
>> keeps happening?
>
> What I'm saying is, look at the diffstat that I purposefully kept above
> - unless modifying qcom.yaml retriggered it (but not any other errors?)
Yes, you are right.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists