[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DAWE690DWP9A.10I5FIJSZDSR6@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 12:27:18 +0200
From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
To: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>, "Boqun Feng"
<boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <rafael@...nel.org>, <ojeda@...nel.org>,
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, <gary@...yguo.net>, <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
<a.hindborg@...nel.org>, <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
<david.m.ertman@...el.com>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>, <leon@...nel.org>,
<kwilczynski@...nel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] rust: devres: get rid of Devres' inner Arc
On Thu Jun 26, 2025 at 12:01 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 09:13:24PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 11:54:01PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> [...]
>> > +#[pin_data(PinnedDrop)]
>> > +pub struct Devres<T> {
>>
>> It makes me realize: I think we need to make `T` being `Send`? Because
>> the devm callback can happen on a different thread other than
>> `Devres::new()` and the callback may drop `T` because of revoke(), so we
>> are essientially sending `T`. Alternatively we can make `Devres::new()`
>> and its friend require `T` being `Send`.
>>
>> If it's true, we need a separate patch that "Fixes" this.
>
> Indeed, that needs a fix.
Oh and we have no `'static` bound on `T` either... We should require
that as well.
---
Cheers,
Benno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists