lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABBYNZJYeYdggm7WEoz4iPM5UAp3F-BOTrL2yTcTfSrgSnQ2ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:14:40 -0400
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
To: Yang Li <yang.li@...ogic.com>
Cc: Pauli Virtanen <pav@....fi>, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, 
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Bluetooth: hci_event: Add support for handling LE BIG
 Sync Lost event

Hi Yang,

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 1:54 AM Yang Li <yang.li@...ogic.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Pauli,
> > [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > ke, 2025-06-25 kello 16:42 +0800, Yang Li via B4 Relay kirjoitti:
> >> From: Yang Li <yang.li@...ogic.com>
> >>
> >> When the BIS source stops, the controller sends an LE BIG Sync Lost
> >> event (subevent 0x1E). Currently, this event is not handled, causing
> >> the BIS stream to remain active in BlueZ and preventing recovery.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.li@...ogic.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - Matching the BIG handle is required when looking up a BIG connection.
> >> - Use ev->reason to determine the cause of disconnection.
> >> - Call hci_conn_del after hci_disconnect_cfm to remove the connection entry
> >> - Delete the big connection
> >> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250624-handle_big_sync_lost_event-v1-1-c32ce37dd6a5@amlogic.com
> >> ---
> >>   include/net/bluetooth/hci.h |  6 ++++++
> >>   net/bluetooth/hci_event.c   | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> >> index 82cbd54443ac..48389a64accb 100644
> >> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> >> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> >> @@ -2849,6 +2849,12 @@ struct hci_evt_le_big_sync_estabilished {
> >>        __le16  bis[];
> >>   } __packed;
> >>
> >> +#define HCI_EVT_LE_BIG_SYNC_LOST 0x1e
> >> +struct hci_evt_le_big_sync_lost {
> >> +     __u8    handle;
> >> +     __u8    reason;
> >> +} __packed;
> >> +
> >>   #define HCI_EVT_LE_BIG_INFO_ADV_REPORT       0x22
> >>   struct hci_evt_le_big_info_adv_report {
> >>        __le16  sync_handle;
> >> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >> index 66052d6aaa1d..d0b9c8dca891 100644
> >> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >> @@ -7026,6 +7026,32 @@ static void hci_le_big_sync_established_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
> >>        hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> >>   }
> >>
> >> +static void hci_le_big_sync_lost_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
> >> +                                         struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> +{
> >> +     struct hci_evt_le_big_sync_lost *ev = data;
> >> +     struct hci_conn *bis, *conn;
> >> +
> >> +     bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "big handle 0x%2.2x", ev->handle);
> >> +
> >> +     hci_dev_lock(hdev);
> >> +
> >> +     list_for_each_entry(bis, &hdev->conn_hash.list, list) {
> > This should check bis->type == BIS_LINK too.
> Will do.
> >
> >> +             if (test_and_clear_bit(HCI_CONN_BIG_SYNC, &bis->flags) &&
> >> +                 (bis->iso_qos.bcast.big == ev->handle)) {
> >> +                     hci_disconn_cfm(bis, ev->reason);
> >> +                     hci_conn_del(bis);
> >> +
> >> +                     /* Delete the big connection */
> >> +                     conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_pa_sync_handle(hdev, bis->sync_handle);
> >> +                     if (conn)
> >> +                             hci_conn_del(conn);
> > Problems:
> >
> > - use after free
> >
> > - hci_conn_del() cannot be used inside list_for_each_entry()
> >    of the connection list
> >
> > - also list_for_each_entry_safe() allows deleting only the iteration
> >    cursor, so some restructuring above is needed
>
> Following your suggestion, I updated the hci_le_big_sync_lost_evt function.
>
> +static void hci_le_big_sync_lost_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
> +                                           struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +       struct hci_evt_le_big_sync_lost *ev = data;
> +       struct hci_conn *bis, *conn, *n;
> +
> +       bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "big handle 0x%2.2x", ev->handle);
> +
> +       hci_dev_lock(hdev);
> +
> +       /* Delete the pa sync connection */
> +       bis = hci_conn_hash_lookup_pa_sync_big_handle(hdev, ev->handle);
> +       if (bis) {
> +               conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_pa_sync_handle(hdev,
> bis->sync_handle);
> +               if (conn)
> +                       hci_conn_del(conn);
> +       }
> +
> +       /* Delete each bis connection */
> +       list_for_each_entry_safe(bis, n, &hdev->conn_hash.list, list) {
> +               if (bis->type == BIS_LINK &&
> +                   bis->iso_qos.bcast.big == ev->handle &&
> +                   test_and_clear_bit(HCI_CONN_BIG_SYNC, &bis->flags)) {
> +                       hci_disconn_cfm(bis, ev->reason);
> +                       hci_conn_del(bis);
> +               }
> +       }

Id follow the logic in hci_le_create_big_complete_evt, so you do something like:

    while ((conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_big_state(hdev, ev->handle,
                              BT_CONNECTED)))...

That way we don't operate on the list cursor, that said we may need to
add the role as parameter to hci_conn_hash_lookup_big_state, because
the BIG id domain is role specific so we can have clashes if there are
Broadcast Sources using the same BIG id the above would return them as
well and even if we check for the role inside the while loop will keep
returning it forever.

> +
> +       hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> +}
>
> >
> >> +             }
> >> +     }
> >> +
> >> +     hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>   static void hci_le_big_info_adv_report_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
> >>                                           struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>   {
> >> @@ -7149,6 +7175,11 @@ static const struct hci_le_ev {
> >>                     hci_le_big_sync_established_evt,
> >>                     sizeof(struct hci_evt_le_big_sync_estabilished),
> >>                     HCI_MAX_EVENT_SIZE),
> >> +     /* [0x1e = HCI_EVT_LE_BIG_SYNC_LOST] */
> >> +     HCI_LE_EV_VL(HCI_EVT_LE_BIG_SYNC_LOST,
> >> +                  hci_le_big_sync_lost_evt,
> >> +                  sizeof(struct hci_evt_le_big_sync_lost),
> >> +                  HCI_MAX_EVENT_SIZE),
> >>        /* [0x22 = HCI_EVT_LE_BIG_INFO_ADV_REPORT] */
> >>        HCI_LE_EV_VL(HCI_EVT_LE_BIG_INFO_ADV_REPORT,
> >>                     hci_le_big_info_adv_report_evt,
> >>
> >> ---
> >> base-commit: bd35cd12d915bc410c721ba28afcada16f0ebd16
> >> change-id: 20250612-handle_big_sync_lost_event-4c7dc64390a2
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> > --
> > Pauli Virtanen



-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ