[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aF6hX511YW3540Jx@e129823.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 14:49:19 +0100
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] coresight: tmc: Support atclk
>
> > @@ -789,6 +789,10 @@ static int __tmc_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *res)
> > struct coresight_desc desc = { 0 };
> > struct coresight_dev_list *dev_list = NULL;
> >
> > + drvdata->atclk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, "atclk");
> > + if (IS_ERR(drvdata->atclk))
> > + return PTR_ERR(drvdata->atclk);
> > +
> > ret = -ENOMEM;
> >
>
> Just another quetion.
>
> If this function is called from tmc_platform_probe() and failed,
> should it call the clk_put() for drvdata->pclk when it failed?
Sorry, I missed the Patch #7.
Thanks
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists