[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e704535c-0004-6dbd-bc81-b4ebc7747881@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 20:42:45 +0530
From: Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>
To: Jorge Ramirez <jorge.ramirez@....qualcomm.com>
CC: <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
<quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>, <mchehab@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm2290: Add venus video node
On 6/27/2025 8:38 PM, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
> On 27/06/25 20:28:29, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>
>> On 6/27/2025 6:03 PM, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
>>> On 27/06/25 17:40:19, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 6/26/2025 7:29 PM, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
>>>>> Add DT entries for the qcm2290 venus encoder/decoder.
>>>>>
>>>>> Co-developed-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez@....qualcomm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi
>>>>> index f49ac1c1f8a3..5326c91a0ff0 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -1628,6 +1628,63 @@ adreno_smmu: iommu@...0000 {
>>>>> #iommu-cells = <2>;
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> + venus: video-codec@...0000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "qcom,qcm2290-venus";
>>>>> + reg = <0 0x5a00000 0 0xf0000>;
>>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 225 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + power-domains = <&gcc GCC_VENUS_GDSC>,
>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_VCODEC0_GDSC>,
>>>>> + <&rpmpd QCM2290_VDDCX>;
>>>>> + power-domain-names = "venus",
>>>>> + "vcodec0",
>>>>> + "cx";
>>>>> + operating-points-v2 = <&venus_opp_table>;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_VENUS_CTL_CLK>,
>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_AHB_CLK>,
>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_VENUS_CTL_AXI_CLK>,
>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_THROTTLE_CORE_CLK>,
>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_VCODEC0_SYS_CLK>,
>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_VCODEC0_AXI_CLK>;
>>>>> + clock-names = "core",
>>>>> + "iface",
>>>>> + "bus",
>>>>> + "throttle",
>>>>> + "vcodec0_core",
>>>>> + "vcodec0_bus";
>>>>> +
>>>>> + memory-region = <&pil_video_mem>;
>>>>> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x860 0x0>,
>>>>> + <&apps_smmu 0x880 0x0>,
>>>>> + <&apps_smmu 0x861 0x04>,
>>>>> + <&apps_smmu 0x863 0x0>,
>>>>> + <&apps_smmu 0x804 0xe0>;
>>>> keep only the non secure ones.
>>>
>>> ok
>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> + interconnects = <&mmnrt_virt MASTER_VIDEO_P0 RPM_ALWAYS_TAG
>>>>> + &bimc SLAVE_EBI1 RPM_ALWAYS_TAG>,
>>>>> + <&bimc MASTER_APPSS_PROC RPM_ACTIVE_TAG
>>>>> + &config_noc SLAVE_VENUS_CFG RPM_ACTIVE_TAG>;
>>>>> + interconnect-names = "video-mem",
>>>>> + "cpu-cfg";
>>>>> +
>>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>>> +
>>>>> + venus_opp_table: opp-table {
>>>>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>>>> +
>>>>> + opp-133000000 {
>>>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <133000000>;
>>>>> + required-opps = <&rpmpd_opp_low_svs>;
>>>>> + };
>>>> Fix the corner freq value
>>>
>>> can you add some reference please?
>>>
>>> I took this data from an internal document - not sure why the downstream
>>> driver supports different values or where those were taken from (AFAIK
>>> they are not supported)
>> Most likely you have referred incorrect downstream file. Refer scuba-vidc.dtsi.
>
> I took them from actual documents (which might or might not be obsolete,
> hard to say but they were the latest version and as such, they
> contradict the downstream dtsi).
>
> So I'd rather not use downstream - could you point me to the reference
> you used please - I wonder if the fix is required downstream instead of here?
You can look for this file gcc-scuba.c and refer gcc_video_venus_clk_src which
is the src for different venus clocks.
>
>> Again, good reference for such cases would IP catalogues and if not, gcc driver
>> in this case which have structures defining different corners for
>> video.
>
> The PM document for this chip only confirms two values - the other 4 ones
> claim they are not supported on 50_LT
>
> but we can discuss offline.
>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Vikash
>>>>> +
>>>>> + opp-240000000 {
>>>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <240000000>;
>>>>> + required-opps = <&rpmpd_opp_svs>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> + };
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> mdss: display-subsystem@...0000 {
>>>>> compatible = "qcom,qcm2290-mdss";
>>>>> reg = <0x0 0x05e00000 0x0 0x1000>;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists