[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4556893f-982b-435d-aed1-d661ee31f862@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:21:47 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@...cinc.com>,
Suruchi Agarwal <quic_suruchia@...cinc.com>,
Pavithra R <quic_pavir@...cinc.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
quic_kkumarcs@...cinc.com, quic_linchen@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 03/14] net: ethernet: qualcomm: Add PPE driver
for IPQ9574 SoC
On 6/26/25 4:31 PM, Luo Jie wrote:
> The PPE (Packet Process Engine) hardware block is available on Qualcomm
> IPQ SoC that support PPE architecture, such as IPQ9574.
>
> The PPE in IPQ9574 includes six integrated ethernet MAC for 6 PPE ports,
> buffer management, queue management and scheduler functions. The MACs
> can connect with the external PHY or switch devices using the UNIPHY PCS
> block available in the SoC.
>
> The PPE also includes various packet processing offload capabilities
> such as L3 routing and L2 bridging, VLAN and tunnel processing offload.
> It also includes Ethernet DMA function for transferring packets between
> ARM cores and PPE ethernet ports.
>
> This patch adds the base source files and Makefiles for the PPE driver
> such as platform driver registration, clock initialization, and PPE
> reset routines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
> ---
[...]
> +static int ppe_clock_init_and_reset(struct ppe_device *ppe_dev)
> +{
> + unsigned long ppe_rate = ppe_dev->clk_rate;
> + struct device *dev = ppe_dev->dev;
> + struct reset_control *rstc;
> + struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
> + struct clk *clk;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ppe_dev->num_icc_paths; i++) {
> + ppe_dev->icc_paths[i].name = ppe_icc_data[i].name;
> + ppe_dev->icc_paths[i].avg_bw = ppe_icc_data[i].avg_bw ? :
> + Bps_to_icc(ppe_rate);
> + ppe_dev->icc_paths[i].peak_bw = ppe_icc_data[i].peak_bw ? :
> + Bps_to_icc(ppe_rate);
> + }
Can you not just set ppe_dev->icc_paths to ppe_icc_data?
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists