[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <306223e7-b760-4d37-b5d2-ac04e3c98842@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 17:30:19 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Introduce "non-pixel" sub node within iris video
node
On 27/06/2025 16:48, Vikash Garodia wrote:
> Changes in v3:
> - Add info about change in iommus binding (Thanks Krzysztof)
> - Link to v2:https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250627-video_cb-v2-0-3931c3f49361@quicinc.com
Hmm.
I would be nice to see what also _wasn't_ done i.e. why you didn't do
what Dmitry was suggesting, IMO that's as important as stating what you
did change.
Not a huge deal you explained in a response email your logic already but
just as suggestion for future, I think its good practice to go through
each point and say what you did do, what you didn't do, perhaps what you
tried and then decided to do in a different way.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists