[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96b3d0fa-7fd2-4d2b-a6d6-cc91ed1dca4e@igalia.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 17:23:03 -0300
From: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] selftests/futex: Add ASSERT_ macros
Em 26/06/2025 19:07, Thomas Gleixner escreveu:
> On Thu, Jun 26 2025 at 14:11, André Almeida wrote:
>
>> Create ASSERT_{EQ, NE, TRUE, FALSE} macros to make test creation easier.
>
> What's so futex special about this that it can't use the same muck in
>
> tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
>
My previous version of this test used kselftest_harness.h, but Shuah
request to keep consistency and don't use this header, giving that the
rest of futex test doesn't use it:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/fe02f42b-7ba8-4a3b-a86c-2a4a7942fd3b@linuxfoundation.org/
> or at least share the implementation in some way?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists