[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250627035420.37712-1-yangyicong@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 11:54:20 +0800
From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>
To: <mingo@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
<vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
CC: <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <bsegall@...gle.com>,
<mgorman@...e.de>, <vschneid@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>, <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Don't count nr_running twice for dl_server proxy tasks
From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
On CPU offline the kernel stalled with below call trace:
INFO: task kworker/0:1:11 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Tainted: G O 6.15.0-rc4+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/0:1 state:D stack:0 pid:11 tgid:11 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4208060 flags:0x00000008
Workqueue: events vmstat_shepherd
Call trace:
__switch_to+0x118/0x188 (T)
__schedule+0x31c/0x1300
schedule+0x3c/0x120
percpu_rwsem_wait+0x12c/0x1b0
__percpu_down_read+0x78/0x188
cpus_read_lock+0xc4/0xe8
vmstat_shepherd+0x30/0x138
process_one_work+0x154/0x3c8
worker_thread+0x2e8/0x400
kthread+0x154/0x230
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
INFO: task kworker/1:1:116 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Tainted: G O 6.15.0-rc4+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/1:1 state:D stack:0 pid:116 tgid:116 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4208060 flags:0x00000008
Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
Call trace:
__switch_to+0x118/0x188 (T)
__schedule+0x31c/0x1300
schedule+0x3c/0x120
schedule_timeout+0x10c/0x120
__wait_for_common+0xc4/0x1b8
wait_for_completion+0x28/0x40
cpuhp_kick_ap_work+0x114/0x3c8
_cpu_down+0x130/0x4b8
__cpu_down_maps_locked+0x20/0x38
work_for_cpu_fn+0x24/0x40
process_one_work+0x154/0x3c8
worker_thread+0x2e8/0x400
kthread+0x154/0x230
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
cpuhp hold the cpu hotplug lock endless and stalled vmstat_shepherd.
This is because we count nr_running twice on cpuhp enqueuing and failed
the wait condition of cpuhp:
enqueue_task_fair() // pick cpuhp from idle, rq->nr_running = 0
dl_server_start()
[...]
add_nr_running() // rq->nr_running = 1
add_nr_running() // rq->nr_running = 2
[switch to cpuhp, waiting on balance_hotplug_wait()]
rcuwait_wait_event(rq->nr_running == 1 && ...) // failed, rq->nr_running=2
schedule() // wait again
This doesn't make sense to count one single task twice on
rq->nr_running. So fix this.
Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index ad45a8fea245..59fb178762ee 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1894,7 +1894,9 @@ void inc_dl_tasks(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
u64 deadline = dl_se->deadline;
dl_rq->dl_nr_running++;
- add_nr_running(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq), 1);
+
+ if (!dl_server(dl_se))
+ add_nr_running(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq), 1);
inc_dl_deadline(dl_rq, deadline);
}
@@ -1904,7 +1906,9 @@ void dec_dl_tasks(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
{
WARN_ON(!dl_rq->dl_nr_running);
dl_rq->dl_nr_running--;
- sub_nr_running(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq), 1);
+
+ if (!dl_server(dl_se))
+ sub_nr_running(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq), 1);
dec_dl_deadline(dl_rq, dl_se->deadline);
}
--
2.24.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists