lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VciZKX8uyZvYsrG6-ffrZbzDEPU4UH06eh9X23qBC0LYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 09:57:07 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Yi Sun <yi.sun@...el.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gordon.jin@...el.com, yi.sun@...ux.intel.com, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, 
	Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: idxd: Remove __packed from structures

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 9:30 AM Yi Sun <yi.sun@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 27.06.2025 07:05, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 03:48:11PM -0700, Vinod Koul kirjoitti:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 04 Apr 2025 13:36:14 +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
> >> > The __packed attribute introduces potential unaligned memory accesses
> >> > and endianness portability issues. Instead of relying on compiler-specific
> >> > packing, it's much better to explicitly fill structure gaps using padding
> >> > fields, ensuring natural alignment.
> >> >
> >> > Since all previously __packed structures already enforce proper alignment
> >> > through manual padding, the __packed qualifiers are unnecessary and can be
> >> > safely removed.
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >> Applied, thanks!
> >
> >Please, don't or fix it ASAP. This patch is broken in the formal things,
> >i.e. changelog entry must not disrupt SoB chain. I'm not sure if Stephen's
> >scripts will catch this up on Linux Next integration, though.
> >
> >--
> >With Best Regards,
> >Andy Shevchenko
> >
> >
>
> Hi Andy
>
>  From what I understand, changelog comments are ignored by git am and do not
> interfere with the SoB chain. They appear after the "---" separator and
> aren't part of the actual commit message. So it should be safe and won't
> break anything during the integration.
>
> Let me know if there's something I might have missed.

Please, look how it looks in the repository:
https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/dmaengine.git/commit/?id=671a654aecc710a278bdd30cfd2afef2d4e0828f
This is wrong.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ