[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87qzz5biyp.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 12:02:38 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>, Hans de Goede
<hdegoede@...hat.com>, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor
Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc: linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] fbdev/simplefb: Add support for interconnect paths
"Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com> writes:
> On Fri Jun 27, 2025 at 9:56 AM CEST, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[...]
>> These two functions contain the same logic that you are using in the
>> simpledrm driver. I wonder if could be made helpers so that the code
>> isn't duplicated in both drivers.
>
> I believe most resource handling code (clocks, regulators,
> power-domains, plus now interconnect) should be pretty generic between
> the two.
>
Yeah.
>>
>> But in any case it could be a follow-up of your series I think.
>
> To be fair, I don't think I'll work on this, I've got plenty of Qualcomm
> SoC-specific bits to work on :)
>
That's OK :) It was just a drive by comment, but as said I don't think
that this code duplication should be a blocker for this patch series.
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists