[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aF3lRKURweT4mhAj@agluck-desk3>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:26:44 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Anil Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/30] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring
Bother. Just got e-mail after posting v6 from lkp. Apparently
I applied the fixes to avoid "'d' used before set" in
domain_remove_cpu_ctrl() and domain_remove_cpu_mon() to some
other branch than the one that made it to my final version.
Please imagine the hunks below merged into patches 7 & 8.
-Tony
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
index 3ec8fbd2f778..39cee572a121 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
@@ -651,8 +651,8 @@ static void domain_remove_cpu_ctrl(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
if (!domain_header_is_valid(hdr, RESCTRL_CTRL_DOMAIN, r->rid))
return;
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &d->hdr.cpu_mask);
- if (!cpumask_empty(&d->hdr.cpu_mask))
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &hdr->cpu_mask);
+ if (!cpumask_empty(&hdr->cpu_mask))
return;
d = container_of(hdr, struct rdt_ctrl_domain, hdr);
@@ -696,8 +696,8 @@ static void domain_remove_cpu_mon(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
if (!domain_header_is_valid(hdr, RESCTRL_MON_DOMAIN, r->rid))
return;
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &d->hdr.cpu_mask);
- if (!cpumask_empty(&d->hdr.cpu_mask))
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &hdr->cpu_mask);
+ if (!cpumask_empty(&hdr->cpu_mask))
return;
switch (r->rid) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists