[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aF57eMeNafg1w9Qw@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 14:07:36 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Abdun Nihaal <abdun.nihaal@...il.com>, andy@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
tzimmermann@...e.de, riyandhiman14@...il.com, willy@...radead.org,
notro@...nnes.org, thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: fix potential memory leak in
fbtft_framebuffer_alloc()
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:59:30AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 11:11:39PM +0300, Dan Carpenter kirjoitti:
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 08:50:43PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 10:54:10PM +0530, Abdun Nihaal wrote:
...
> Ah, you have a point. Yes, the moving vmem allocation will solve the ordering
> issue.
...with moving from devm for the txbuf. Otherwise we would still have a
problematic ordering with it.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists